Stalins manipulation of the central organs of the Communist Party Essay Example for Free

Stalins utilisation of the central variety meat of the Communist companionship EssayStalins manipulation of the central organs of the Communist Party was they let on reason for his germinate to power by 1929. How far do you agree with this statement? delectation the sources and your own knowledge to answer the question.The rise of Stalin to his position of extreme power is a result of a number of factor outs varying from Stalins personal characteristics and policy-making skills to the situation of Russia in the years 1924.29. The melodic phrase that Stalin came to power as a result of his control of the central organs is strong. However, it is vital that the other factors ar not pink-slipped as they all play an importance in Stalins rise to power.Source A strongly aids the argument that it was his control of the companionship that resulted in his rise to power by explaining how Stalin had total control over the party and was able to allows his supporters to move up to the higher levels of the party, in which his main rivals were replaced with. Stalins control and organisation of the Secretariat was a key factor that helped him to gradually replace his opponents with his supporters, therefore allowing him to maximise his support of the whole party. This source explains how it was not only the control of the central organs but also Stalins political cunning that was key to his rise in power. StalinsSource B supports this argument to a certain extent but explores other factors that were vital to his rise in power. This includes Stalins policies and in particular Socialism in one country which urged for modernisation through industrialisation with turn up the help of those outside. This policy carried undertones of nationalism and patriotism, appealing to the masses despite it clearly going against the red ink theory. Socialism in one country proved far more popular than Permanent variety as it gave the Russians historic roles. However, it was not just this one policy that contributed to his popularity. His positions on the NEP and his decision to go for speedy industrialisation at the end of the 1920s were supported by the majority of the party. It can also be inferred from the source that Stalins political skill played a major role as he was antiphonal to the mood of the times and exploited this to his benefit.An alternative explanation is found in source C where a modern historians intentionalist interpretation of Stalins rise to power informs of Stalins ruthlessness being of great benefit to him. Furthermore, during the 1920s Stalin would a lot speak last at Politburo (The key decision making body) and would float in and out of alliances. His overlook of loyalty to any of his colleagues was extremely beneficial to him, as he would cunningly float in and out of alliances as a way of gaining popularity. This was the case with Stalins change of policy on the NEP when he turned and attacked the properly wing of the p arty and adopted the very policies of which he had smashed with the left of the party. Stalins cunning and intelligent political attributes are key in his rise to power. Furthermore, the source offers the idea that his own personal characteristics, being a disloyal and ruthless, played a dominant part in his climb to supreme power.However, there are a number of arguments that have not been presented in the sources. Stalins political skills, personal characteristics, policies and his control of the party organs have all been contested in the sources but there are many other factors that must be considered. Firstly is Stalins position in 1924 before Lenins death. Stalin had began to lay the foundations for his rise to power before Lenin was utterly by exploiting the weakness of the central organs due to Lenins ill health. As a result of Stalin displace the foundations when Lenin was still in power he was able to become General Secretary in 1924. This came well-nigh due to Stalin be ing the link between the leader Lenin and the Politburo. The position of Stalin before Lenins death is a factor that must not be ignored, as it was when Stalin began to lay the foundations of what became his rise to power.His role of the General Secretary was key to him becoming more powerful within the party and being able to have his supporters entered into the party at the higher levels. Secondly, Lenins funeral played an important part in Stalins rise, as he was able to show how he could manipulate events. Stalin played a crucial part in Lenins funeral promoting his intention of continuing Lenins work. Trotsky failure to realise the funeral just further added to Stalins growing popularity and raised questions about Trotskys respect towards Lenin. Another crucial factor that added to Stalins victory was the weakness of his opponents and in particular, Trotsky. Trotsky attacked the policies of the party and believed that it was becoming far too bureaucratic.These comments were o nly to increase his unpopularity as the bureaucracy had grown in size during Lenins reign as leader therefore Trotsky was criticising Lenins leadership. This was not a grievous idea as Lenin was a cult figure in Russia and a much respected foregone leader by the party members. He also came under particular pressure when faced against the Triumvirate (Stalin, Zinoviev and Kamenev). By this time Trotskys support was absolutely minimal and he made little effort to gain support or even organise the support he had.By 1926 Trotskys weakness was finally exploited as Stalin was in the position to expel him. By 1929 Trotsky was neither in the party or the country as Stalin had expelled him from the party and country. Finally, there is an element of luck that contributed to Stalins rise. For example, Lenins testament was not read out which was lucky for Stalin as he said that Stalin was too rude and even went as far as to say that he should be removed from his current post of General Secre tary. Moreover, for most of the struggle for power, Trotsky, whom was possibly his closest challenge, was ill. Trotskys disorder was the reason he was not in Russia for Lenins funeral and relied purely on Stalin for the date of the funeral.